Phone numbers synchronization - mapping
Verfasst: Fr 19. Sep 2008, 08:44
I would like to draw your attention on the existing mapping between UIQ phones and MPE (and Thunderbird). I know this has already be mentioned in the past but I think the existing solution can be confusing. Let me enter in the details:
The existing solution maps
MOBILE in UIQ -> MOBILE (W) in MPE -> MOBILE in TB
but also
MOBILE (W) in UIQ -> MOBILE (W) in MPE -> MOBILE in TB
if :
1) you enter a number in MOBILE (W) in MPE
2) synchronize with UIQ works OK by filling and updating the UIQ filed MOBILE (W)
3) enter a number in MOBILE in UIQ
4) the synchronization from now on will be between MOBILE in UIQ and MOBILE (W) in MPE, ending up in having two fields in UIQ and MPE with the same name (MOBILE (W) ) but with different content.
I cannot suggest you the technical solution but I noticed that if you backup the address book in UIQ, the VCF file in output shows the correct tags for the two fields: mobile and mobile(w).
The existing solution maps
MOBILE in UIQ -> MOBILE (W) in MPE -> MOBILE in TB
but also
MOBILE (W) in UIQ -> MOBILE (W) in MPE -> MOBILE in TB
if :
1) you enter a number in MOBILE (W) in MPE
2) synchronize with UIQ works OK by filling and updating the UIQ filed MOBILE (W)
3) enter a number in MOBILE in UIQ
4) the synchronization from now on will be between MOBILE in UIQ and MOBILE (W) in MPE, ending up in having two fields in UIQ and MPE with the same name (MOBILE (W) ) but with different content.
I cannot suggest you the technical solution but I noticed that if you backup the address book in UIQ, the VCF file in output shows the correct tags for the two fields: mobile and mobile(w).